What personal data we collect and why we collect it
Comments
When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.
An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.
Media
If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.
Contact forms
Cookies
If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.
If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.
When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select “Remember Me”, your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.
If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.
Embedded content from other websites
Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.
These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.
Analytics
Who we share your data with
How long we retain your data
If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.
For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.
What rights you have over your data
If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.
Where we send your data
Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.
Your contact information
Additional information
How we protect your data
What data breach procedures we have in place
What third parties we receive data from
What automated decision making and/or profiling we do with user data
因而，筆者此番要真心誠意的感恩一下現任官員、讚嘆現任官員的挺台言論。據悉，外電英國《每日電訊報》報導，現任英國國防大臣希利（John Healey）強調，如果台灣海峽爆發衝突，英國已經做好在太平洋地區投入戰鬥的準備（Britain is ready to fight in the Pacific if conflict breaks out over Taiwan），想當然耳的，此一報導立即獲得我外交部與國防部的高度歡迎，外交部發言人蕭光偉對英國政府能公開表達共同維護印太區域和平與穩定的決心表示肯定，國防部長顧立雄則強調，希利的發言顯示全世界對中共威權主義的擴張感到憂心，我國應戮力加強提升戰備整備。
然而，果若細究該一報導「完整的原文與原意」後，誠如人工智慧ChatGPT所分析指出，在英式英語裡的fight for Taiwan和fight over Taiwan具有不同的意涵與程度差別，fight for是明確表達出支持與協防、保護台灣的立場，積極地展示出站在台灣這一邊的態度．例如「願意為了台灣的自由或民主而戰」就會使用fight for。至於fight over Taiwan，則是基本圍繞在台灣的控制權、地位或歸屬問題而戰，強調台灣是引發衝突的戰略焦點或爭端來源，因此「使用fight over「並非明確表態支持誰」，而是表示英國可能因區域局勢而介入戰爭，屬於較為中立的語氣云云。
坦白說，站在維護中華民國的國家主權尊嚴與廣大人民利益上，筆者對此次終有「現任」的外國官員，發表有利維護台灣安全的看法自是十分肯定與認同無誤，而不是每每都似乎後知後覺或是大夢初醒般在「卸任」後才敢才會才能「大膽的真情流露？」。因而，筆者必須烏鴉的說一下真話，其實不管是fight for Taiwan和fight over Taiwan兩者間不同的含義外，果若英國真的「有心也有guts」的話，就應先有道德勇氣與實事求是精神的先承認一下「中華民國的事實存在」，不是嗎？否則，這種近乎「一中各表各取所需」的技術性發言，還真的是有點為德不卒啊。
